First of all, you want to thank the publisher and the reviewers getting the effort dedicated to looking at that it manuscript. The comments was very beneficial to improve our very own functions.
Playing with a large test out-of solitary Spanish students is asian single solution free (n = 902) it papers discusses exactly how personal variations in mating direction varies between men and women having fun with matchmaking apps and you may low-users. My understanding of addition is they need to view the relationship between mating small-identity and enough time-title orientations plus the access to matchmaking apps. In lieu of looking at facts that will impact the entry to matchmaking software due to the fact learned on the past literature, they expect needs for very long-term and you may short-title mating orientation on accessibility relationship applications. Specifically, they regress age gender, sexual positioning, while the usage of matchmaking apps on SOI-R, SOI-Behavior, SOI-Thinking, and SOI-Desire, and you may Enough time-label Mating Direction (LTMO). E.grams., throughout the abstract they claim that there were no differences in the much time-label positioning due to the fact a function of play with/non-fool around with. I find this tricky from a theoretic part, while they apparently assume that matchmaking software fool around with can impact mating orientation rather than the almost every other way to. Mating direction due to the fact mentioned which have SOI-Roentgen and you may MSOI try measures out of needs and you will identification characteristics.
Response: We would like to give thanks to Customer step one with the some time and work committed to examining our very own manuscript and his/their own comments. The guidance was basically very useful to evolve all of our performs.
Many thanks for the chance to explain this aspect. The research purpose is to verify in the event the there are differences when considering profiles and you can non-pages out-of relationships applications inside mating orientations (short-identity and you may long-term). We have tried to make this crisper because of the altering the fresh new identity your manuscript, which is now “Manage more youthful relationship application pages and low-users differ during the mating orientations?”. Within data, no certain causality (identity applications use or apps fool around with personality) is intended. Having a mix-sectional build, we cannot expose people. You will find made use of the analysis that people envision that’s ideal suitable for reaction to the research concern. Throughout the Abstract (p. 2, lines 30-33), for example, we authored:
It actually was unearthed that, while relationships applications profiles got a higher short-title mating positioning than low-pages (more regular choices, highest attention, and more positive attitude), there were no variations in the fresh new enough time-identity positioning since a function of explore/non-fool around with.
Right here, in addition to all through the manuscript, you will find presented the results because the descriptive, perhaps not that have people certain presumption out-of grounds and outcomes.
The procedure area gets a good effect of your decide to try functions. The newest try regarding people seem to diverge somewhat of a broad student populace for brand new proportion off low-heterosexual students. That isn’t talked about about investigation restrictions (decreased representativeness).
Response: Many thanks very much to suit your comments and suggestion. All of our shot is really so distinct from regarding degree achieved various other geographic and social contexts, that have a higher ratio of participants away from sexual minorities. But not, we are unsure regarding the why this ought to be indicative out of lack from representativeness, whether or not, definitely, we including usually do not ensure representativeness in our take to. The fresh new testing for this research are comparable otherwise nearly the same as new sampling out-of early in the day studies regarding the exact same research group (pick Table below).