New impression data is actually presented online and got just as much as ten minutes accomplish. Very first, participants was in fact invited and you can informed about the process of the fresh try. Immediately after professionals considering written told agree from the paid survey in itself, the newest try come from the answering a number of demographic inquiries (elizabeth.g., gender, age). Centered on the expressed sexual taste, people had been then given four users which were at random chose regarding gang of 154 character texts compiled by dudes or feminine. Given that users have been advised that they might end the https://internationalwomen.net/sv/blog/latin-kvinnor-dating-webbplatser/ new try out within anytime, not all the people evaluated four pages. Players watched one to profile at the same time; after each and every character, professionals examined the brand new creativity of one’s profile and you can were inquired about attitudes of one’s identity (cleverness, sense of humor, oddness) and you may elegance (bodily, public, close appeal) of your character manager. Before the second profile is demonstrated, members answered having an indeed/zero question whether or not they desires carry on a date for the reputation manager. In the end, the players just who ran in the check out was basically thanked, debriefed, and you will permitted to get off statements, and you will was then rerouted towards contact form of your own relationships webpages that they you are going to fill out when they got interest in doing an excellent raffle having a great about three-months free membership.
Except for purpose up to now, the details within this research was indeed measured towards a great Likert scale from just one (completely disagree) so you can 7 (totally consent). Intent so far was measured on one binary yes/no matter: “I would like to embark on a date with this people”. Brand new study’s independent variable was thought of character text message creativity, that has been measured with the goods “It profile text looks original for me”. Virtually any facts was mainly produced from existing bills, for the text interpreted and you will a little modified to suit our very own test.
All the around three mediation variables associated with the research was counted by a couple of points. Imagined cleverness is measured toward facts “I do believe this person is sensible/intelligent” (predicated on ; Pearson’s r = .83), observed love of life towards the facts “I think this individual have jokes/is actually funny” (following the ; Pearson’s roentgen = .82), and perceived oddness is mentioned into affairs “In my opinion this person are odd/peculiar” (after the [39,40]; Pearson’s r = .77).
The outcome parameters from attractiveness was in fact measured with about three things, each layer a special aspect regarding imagined elegance: actual attractiveness (“I think this person is right-looking”), personal attractiveness (“I believe this individual are form”; ), and you will personal appeal (“I could be seduced by this individual”; ).
All participants who rated at least one dating profile from the full set of 308 profiles were included in the dataset, with a maximum of five profiles (M = 2.95, SD = 1.50). In total, 775 participants (62.8%) viewed and assessed the maximum of five profiles. Seven participants who did not want to indicate their sexual preference, were presented with a total of ten profiles of which five were from men and five from women. This together resulted in 4289 individual profile assessments. The 308 texts differed in the number of times they were rated, ranging between 7 and 20 ratings per text (M = , SD = 2.56). With the irrNA package in R , intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 1,k) were calculated for all eight impression formation variables, providing an indication of the internal consistency of the scores given to the different texts by the different participants. All ICC’s were between .66 and .85 (ICCmean = .80; see file ICC Scores on OSF for further details), indicating a good reliability between scores given by participants . Consequently, data was aggregated on text level and mean scores were calculated for each of the variables. For dating intention, which was measured with a dichotomous yes/no question, the text mean score ranged between 0 and 1, with higher scores indicating more willingness to date the profile owner.